Loading icon

buddhism and porn

Share:

But there is no doubt that a good deal of the enormous respect shown to members of both communities stems directly from the knowledge of their celibate way of life. I should check it out! Those inclined to develop a guilt-complex about their sex-life should realize that failure in this respect is neither more, nor, on the other hand, less serious than failure to live up to any other precept. Kama is identified as one of five hindrances to the attainment of jhana according to the Buddha's teaching. Now of course, very early marriages can turn out well. It is an undertaking by you to yourself, to do your best to observe a certain type of restraint, because you understand that it is a good thing to do. So one, always mindful, should avoid sensual desires. In this game, the dice are loaded against us. Retrieved 18 August Why is that? But the opinions expressed here are, of course, my own. Always, Buddhism teaches us to avoid extremes and to find a middle way. Download as PDF Printable version. In the land of the strange but true, as a former Tibetan Buddhist nun I fell in love with and married a man who counsels sex addicts and who is a recovering sex addict himself. But it should be borne in mind that sex does usually involve at least one other person, and potentially the next generation. For the vast majority or people, of course, there is no question of their attempting such a thing except perhaps, for relatively short periods. Since most people in the West have some Christian conditioning — even if only indirectly — it is as well to be clear about this. Otherwise, all rights reserved. For the average lay person, the Third Precept is on exactly the same footing as the other four.

buddhism and porn

In the Buddha's first discourse , he identifies craving tanha as the cause of suffering dukkha. He then identifies three objects of craving: the craving for existence; the craving for non-existence and the craving for sense pleasures kama.

Kama is identified as one of five hindrances to the attainment of jhana according to the Buddha's teaching. Throughout the Sutta Pitaka the Buddha often compares sexual pleasure to arrows or darts. So in the Kama Sutta 4. If one, longing for sensual pleasure, achieves it, yes, he's enraptured at heart.

The mortal gets what he wants. But if for that person — longing, desiring — the pleasures diminish, he's shattered, as if shot with an arrow. So one, always mindful, should avoid sensual desires. Letting them go, he will cross over the flood like one who, having bailed out the boat, has reached the far shore.

The 'flood' refers to the deluge of human suffering. The 'far shore' is nibbana , a state in which there is no sensual desire. The meaning of the Kama Sutta is that sensual desire, like any habitual sense pleasure, brings suffering. To lay people the Buddha advised that they should at least avoid sexual misconduct See Theravada definition below. From the Buddha's full-time disciples, the ordained monks and nuns, strict celibacy called brahmacarya had always been required.

Former Vice President of the Buddhist Society and Chairman of the English Sangha Trust, Maurice Walshe, wrote an essay called 'Buddhism and Sex' in which he presented Buddha's essential teaching on human sexuality and its relationship to the goal nibbana. The third of the five precepts states:. The literal meaning of this statement is, "I undertake the course of training in refraining from wrong-doing in respect of sensuality.

There is, in the Buddhist view, nothing uniquely wicked about sexual offenses or failings. Those inclined to develop a guilt-complex about their sex-life should realize that failure in this respect is neither more, nor, on the other hand, less serious than failure to live up to any other precept. In point of fact, the most difficult precept of all for nearly everybody to live up to is the fourth — to refrain from all forms of wrong speech which often includes uncharitable comments on other people's real or alleged sexual failings!

What precisely, then, does the Third Precept imply for the ordinary lay Buddhist? Firstly, in common with all the other precepts, it is a rule of training. It is not a "commandment" from God, the Buddha, or anyone else saying: "Thou shalt not It is an undertaking by you to yourself, to do your best to observe a certain type of restraint, because you understand that it is a good thing to do. This must be clearly understood.

If you don't think it is a good thing to do, you should not undertake it. If you do think it is a good thing to do, but doubt your ability to keep it, you should do your best, and probably, you can get some help and instruction to make it easier. If you feel it is a good thing to attempt to tread the Buddhist path, you may undertake this and the other precepts, with sincerity, in this spirit.

The Buddha's teaching arises out of a wish for others to be free from dukkha. According to the doctrine he taught, freedom from suffering involves freedom from sexual desires and the training Pali: sikkha to get rid of the craving involves to a great extent abstaining from those desires. Theravada uses the pali suttas and commentaries for references. Bhikkhu Nyanamoli has provided an English Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya 41, "He is given over to misconduct in sexual desires: he has intercourse with such women as are protected by the mother, father, mother and father , brother, sister, relatives, as have a husband, as entail a penalty, and also with those that are garlanded in token of betrothal.

Apart from certain schools in Japan and Tibet, most who choose to practice Buddhism as ordained monks and nuns , also choose to live in celibacy. Sex is seen as a serious monastic transgression. Within Theravada Buddhism there are four principal transgressions which entail expulsion from the monastic Sangha : sex, theft, murder, and falsely boasting of superhuman perfections.

The Buddha's criticism of a monk who broke his celibate vows—without having disrobed first—is as follows:. Worthless man, [sexual intercourse] is unseemly, out of line, unsuitable, and unworthy of a contemplative ; improper and not to be done Haven't I taught the Dhamma in many ways for the sake of dispassion and not for passion; for unfettering and not for fettering; for freedom from clinging and not for clinging?

Yet here, while I have taught the Dhamma for dispassion, you set your heart on passion; while I have taught the Dhamma for unfettering, you set your heart on being fettered; while I have taught the Dhamma for freedom from clinging, you set your heart on clinging. Worthless man, haven't I taught the Dhamma in many ways for the fading of passion, the sobering of intoxication, the subduing of thirst, the destruction of attachment, the severing of the round, the ending of craving, dispassion, cessation, unbinding?

Haven't I in many ways advocated abandoning sensual pleasures, comprehending sensual perceptions, subduing sensual thirst, destroying sensual thoughts, calming sensual fevers? Worthless man, it would be better that your penis be stuck into the mouth of a poisonous snake than into a woman's vagina. It would be better that your penis be stuck into the mouth of a black viper than into a woman's vagina. It would be better that your penis be stuck into a pit of burning embers, blazing and glowing, than into a woman's vagina.

Why is that? For that reason you would undergo death or death-like suffering, but you would not on that account, at the break-up of the body, after death, fall into deprivation, the bad destination, the abyss, hell Worthless man, this neither inspires faith in the faithless nor increases the faithful. Rather, it inspires lack of faith in the faithless and wavering in some of the faithful. The most common formulation of Buddhist ethics are the Five Precepts and the Eightfold Path , which say that one should neither be attached to nor crave sensual pleasure.

These precepts take the form of voluntary, personal undertakings, not divine mandate or instruction. The third of the Five Precepts is "To refrain from committing sexual misconduct. Celibacy or Brahmacariya rules pertain only to the Eight precepts or the 10 monastic precepts. According to the Theravada traditions there are some statements attributed to Gautama Buddha on the nature of sexual misconduct.

In Everyman's Ethics , a collection of four specific suttas compiled and translated by Narada Thera , it is said that adultery is one of four evils the wise will never praise. According to some Tibetan authorities, the physical practice of sexual yoga is necessary at the highest level for the attainment of Buddhahood.

It is only permitted after years of training. The founder of the sect Tsongkhapa did not, according to tradition, engage in this practice, but instead attained complete enlightenment at the moment of death, that being according to this school the nearest possible without sexual yoga. The school also taught that they are only appropriate for the most elite practitioners, who had directly realized emptiness and who had unusually strong compassion.

The next largest school in Tibet, the Nyingma, holds that this is not necessary to achieve Buddhahood in one lifetime. Among Buddhists there is a wide diversity of opinion about homosexuality. Buddhism teaches that sensual enjoyment and desire in general, and sexual pleasure in particular, are hindrances to enlightenment , and inferior to the kinds of pleasure see, e.

The third of the five precepts admonishes against "sexual misconduct"; however, "sexual misconduct" is a broad term, subject to interpretation according to followers' social norms. Early Buddhism appears to have been silent regarding homosexual relations. Some later traditions feature restrictions on non-vagina sex, though its situations seem involving coerced sex.

Conservative Buddhist leaders like Chan master Hsuan Hua have spoken against the act of homosexuality. The situation is different for monastics. For them, the Vinaya code of monastic discipline bans all sexual activity, but does so in purely physiological terms, making no moral distinctions among the many possible forms of intercourse. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The relation between Buddhist theory and practice and sexuality. Dharma Concepts. Buddhist texts. Buddhism by country. See also: Tantra techniques. Main article: Buddhism and sexual orientation. Retrieved Buddhist Ethics: The Path to Nirvana. Wisdom Pubns; New Ed edition. Critical Terms for the Study of Buddhism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Access to Insight. Archived from the original on Retrieved 18 August BuddhaNet Magazine. Retrieved September 20, Buddhist Publication Society. Archived from the original PDF on Shambhala Publ. The Ten Pillars of Buddhism. Windhorse Publications. Oxford University Press , page Translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. AN Abandoning sensual misconduct, he abstains from sensual misconduct. The lay man is told to abstain from sex with "unsuitable partners" defined as girls under age, women betrothed or married and women who have taken vows of religious celibacy.

This is clear, sound advice and seems to suggest that sexual misconduct is that which would disrupt existing family or love relationships.

This is consonant with the general Buddhist principle that that which causes suffering for oneself or others is unethical behaviour. There is no good reason to assume that homosexual relations which do not violate this principle should be treated differently.

Buddhism teaches that sensual enjoyment and desire in general, and sexual pleasure in particular, are hindrances to enlightenment, and inferior to the kinds of pleasure (see, e.g. pīti, a Pāli word often translated as "rapture") that are integral to the practice of jhāna. Buddhism and Sex This is an age in which sexual matters are discussed with great openness. There are many who are puzzled to know what the Buddhist attitude towards sex is, and it is therefore to be hoped that the following guidelines may be found helpful towards an understanding. Jun 08,  · People with strong religious beliefs are at lower risk for many behavioral health conditions, including drug and alcohol problems. But, stronger religious beliefs increase the risk of a person.

buddhism and porn

Badiner holds a masters degree in Buddhist studies and has been a student of Thich Nhat Hanh for over 20 years. If I want to live an enlightened life, do I need to stop having sex?

Yes, you would need to stop. But only to demonstrate sufficiently to yourself that you are able to do so. Subsequently you will be acting from real choice—not habit, compulsion, or escape. It would be sex as a conscious choice.

I imagine that the quality of the experience can only benefit from more consciousness and self-awareness. Buddhism is not inclined to deny the reality of basic human impulses, including sexuality. As sexuality is a normal, healthy, and necessary aspect of human existence, Tibetan tantric Buddhism even includes techniques for bringing mindfulness and practice to it. Some recent Tibetan teachers and several colorful Zen masters have been open to using sex as a porn scary spice means to point their students toward realization.

Why is it then that Buddhist monks and nuns have traditionally refrained from sexual activity? Sex is the ever-sweet and ever-present distraction. Monks and nuns have always had https://flirterhot.xyz/big-tits/georgie-lyall-porn-videos.php limitations on physical contact between them, and between them and laypeople.

In the West, the majority of us never really question the positive value of romantic relationships. We might complain about them, or roll our eyes at them, but, mostly, we assume that they are what we need on a fundamental level. Should we be thinking more critically about our deep belief in romantic relationships? All beliefs should be subject to questioning, including the idea have weave porn for romantic relationships are always what we need.

Ironically, letting go of such a belief may make it more possible for a romantic relationship to actually manifest. I just read a review of a book in The Atlantic called Love 2. Buddhism never argues with good science. Obviously fidelity and loyalty are usually seen as essential components of a happy marriage, but Buddhism views marriage as a secular institution and leaves people to sort these things out for themselves, including whether the relationship is between same or different genders as well as between two or more partners.

As lay Buddhists, how can we begin to have rewarding, non-harming relationships? You are more likely to have rewarding, non-harming relationships if that is in fact your goal. And that is the goal in Buddhism click here buddhism and porn your relationships—from family to strangers. Click at this page with mindfulness of that goal can buddhism and porn it, Buddhist or otherwise.

Maybe not the classiest way to meet people, but there seems to be increasing acceptance and use of online dating services, so why not one for singles with an interest in dharma.

Buddhism and porn should check it out! Thank you for subscribing to Tricycle! As a nonprofit, we depend on readers like you to keep Buddhist teachings and practices widely available. Subscribe now to read this article and get immediate access to everything else. Tricycle is a nonprofit that depends on reader support. Help us share Buddhist teachings and practices by donating now.

Get Daily Dharma in your email. Please try again. Explore timeless teachings through modern methods. This article is only for Subscribers!

The greater part of it also appeared in the journal Sangha. As one of the older generation, I have felt very conscious of my temerity in trying to write something on this subject which younger people might be willing to read.

In this connection, I am very grateful to Alan and Jacqui James for giving me the benefit of their criticism, a task for which they are doubly qualified, being both wise in the Dhamma and at the same time much closer in age to the younger generation who may read this. But the opinions expressed here are, of course, my own. This is an age in which sexual matters are discussed with great openness. There are many who are puzzled to know what the Buddhist attitude towards sex is, and it is therefore to be hoped that the following guidelines may be found helpful towards an understanding.

It is, of course, true to say that Buddhism, in keeping with the principle of the Middle Way, would advocate neither extreme puritanism nor extreme permissiveness, but this, as a guiding principle without further specification, may not seem sufficiently helpful for most people.

In the first place, we must distinguish between the rules undertaken by Buddhist monks for their own conduct, and any guiding principles for lay people. A bhikkhu, or fully-ordained monk in the Theravada tradition, has taken upon himself a set of rules of conduct.

The aim of all of these is to enable him to conduct himself in such a way as is most conducive to the attaining of Enlightenment. The rules are voluntarily undertaken, and if a monk feels unable to live up to them, he is free to leave the Order, which is considered much more honorable than hypocritically remaining in the robe while knowingly infringing the rule. There are four basic rules, infringement of which is termed Parajika or "Defeat," and involves irrevocable expulsion from the Order.

The only one we are concerned with here is the first, which deals with sexual intercourse. Complete sexual continence is considered an essential feature of the monastic life. Intercourse of a heterosexual or homosexual character is automatically a Parajika offense. A monk who performs such an act is considered to have expelled himself from the Order, and is no longer in communion with the other monks.

Any acts of a sexually unbecoming nature falling short of intercourse result in suspension and require expiation. Samaneras, or novice monks, who break their training in this respect are disrobed. The same principle applies to the Mahayana schools and of course, to nuns in those schools where they exist. There is no such thing as a "married monk," though in certain schools, especially in Japan, a form of "quasi-monasticism" with married teachers who retain a form of ordination is permitted under certain conditions.

But all this has no relevance to the Theravada Sangha. Before turning to our main theme, it is as well to have some idea of the sexual mores of ancient India in the Buddha's time. Gotama himself, as a prince, was brought up surrounded by concubines and dancing-girls as a matter of course.

Polygamy was common. Ambapali, the courtesan from whom the Buddha accepted gifts, was a person of some consequence. It was not expected that young men would lead a life of much restraint, and the Buddha with his profound understanding of human nature knew well what demands to make of people in this respect.

Thus we find the following formulation of what a man should avoid:. He avoids unlawful sexual intercourse, abstains from it. He has no intercourse with girls who are still under the protection of father or mother, brother, sister, or relative; nor with married women, nor female convicts; nor lastly with betrothed girls.

If a man could observe greater restraint than this, so much the better. The Buddha's outlook on this question was, then, realistic for his age, and we should endeavor to view the subject as realistically as possible in the light of modern conditions. The third of the Five Precepts undertaken by lay Buddhists runs: Kamesu micchacara veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami , "I undertake the course of training in refraining from wrong-doing in respect of sensuality.

With these, too, we are not further concerned, as their position is now obvious. For the average lay person, the Third Precept is on exactly the same footing as the other four. There is, in the Buddhist view, nothing uniquely wicked about sexual offenses or failings. Those inclined to develop a guilt-complex about their sex-life should realize that failure in this respect is neither more, nor, on the other hand, less serious than failure to live up to any other precept.

In point of fact, the most difficult precept of all for nearly everybody to live up to is the fourth — to refrain from all forms of wrong speech which often includes uncharitable comments on other people's real or alleged sexual failings! What precisely, then, does the Third Precept imply for the ordinary lay Buddhist?

Firstly, in common with all the other precepts, it is a rule of training. It is not a "commandment" from God, the Buddha, or anyone else saying: "Thou shalt not It is an undertaking by you to yourself, to do your best to observe a certain type of restraint, because you understand that it is a good thing to do.

This must be clearly understood. If you don't think it is a good thing to do, you should not undertake it. If you do think it is a good thing to do, but doubt your ability to keep it, you should do your best, and probably, you can get some help and instruction to make it easier.

If you feel it is a good thing to attempt to tread the Buddhist path, you may undertake this and the other precepts, with sincerity, in this spirit. Secondly, what is the scope and purpose of this precept? The word kama means in Pali "sensual desire," which is not exclusively sexual. It is here used in a plural form which comes close to what is meant by the Biblical expression "the lusts of the flesh. Most people who are strongly addicted to sexual indulgence are also much drawn to other sense-pleasures.

Though we are here only concerned with the sexual aspect, this point should be noted. For those with any grasp at all of Buddhist principles, the basic reason for such an injunction should be immediately obvious. Our dukkha — our feeling, of frustration and dissatisfaction with life — is rooted in our desires and cravings. The more these can be brought under control, the less dukkha we shall experience.

It is as simple as that. But of course, that which is simple is not necessarily easy. Thus while there is, so to speak, a considerable overlap in the content of the Third Precept with the Jewish and Christian commandment, "Thou shalt not commit adultery," there is a big difference in the spirit and approach.

Since most people in the West have some Christian conditioning — even if only indirectly — it is as well to be clear about this. The traditional Christian view is that sexual intercourse is permissible solely within the marriage-bond.

Even then the implication is that, except as a necessary means for the procreation of children, it is really rather a bad thing, and should be restricted as far as possible — hence the debate about "the pill" and the like. Certain things such as contraception, homosexual activity, and so on are often looked on with horror and declared "unnatural" which cannot be entirely correct since, after all, they happen! Some of these prohibitions may today be more honored in the breach than the observance, but there is no doubt that rigid views of this sort are still widely held and officially propagated.

The inevitable reaction, encouraged by some real or alleged psychological experts, is towards an attitude of total permissiveness, in which "anything goes. The one is merely an inadequate reaction against the other. What we have to do — what Buddhism in fact teaches us to do — is to map out a sane course between the two. Reduced to essentials, the great debate about sex revolves, for many people, around the concept of sin.

To the puritan, indulgence in sexual activity for the sake of pleasure is evil, wicked, or, as he tends to say, "sinful" i. To the permissivist to coin an awkward but convenient term , this is nonsense. He probably rejects the term "sin" as meaningless, and not only sees nothing evil in sexual pleasure but regards it as, highly legitimate, perhaps as the highest pleasure there is and certainly as something to which, in principle at least, everybody has a right.

Many people, coming from a more or less Christian background with at least some puritanical overtones, find the true Buddhist attitude to this problem rather difficult to see. Perhaps they have never even been given a clear explanation of it or, if they have, it may have seemed too technical for them, and they have not grasped the point.

The point, in fact, is of considerable importance, so it is worthwhile attempting to make it clear. It involves a proper elementary grasp of what is meant by kamma — something which many people, who may have been "Buddhists" for years, have never had. We may, however, perhaps begin more profitably by considering the word "sin.

This explanation is of course not wrong in terms of Christian theology, but is not applicable in Buddhism, where there are no such commandments that one can infringe. As already indicated, the so-called precepts are in fact undertakings to oneself, which is something different. They are more on a par with the instruction "Look both ways before you cross the road. However, there is another rendering of the word sin itself which in fact though less well-known comes much closer to the Buddhist view of things.

In the Bible, "sin" actually renders Hebrew and Greek words which literally mean "missing the mark," i. The sinner, then, is like an unskillful archer who misses his aim could this be the real meaning of Zen and the Art of Archery? But this comes, surely, very close to the idea of akusala kamma or "unskilled action" in Buddhism.

The Pali word kamma Sanskrit karma literally means "action" i. The results of action kamma accrue to the doer as vipaka, which is pleasant when the action was skilled, unpleasant when it was unskilled if I look before I cross the road, I shall get across safely, which is pleasant; if I don't look I may get run down, which is unpleasant. The feelings we experience are in fact of the nature of vipaka — they are dependent on past kamma.

And of course we are continually creating fresh kamma for a good part of our time. It should therefore be noted that the feeling of pleasure sexual or otherwise is not an action, but a result. There is, therefore, nothing either "skillful" or "unskillful" about experiencing such a feeling.

We should therefore not regard it as either "virtuous" or "sinful. Such pleasant feelings can be enjoyed with a clear conscience and no guilt feeling. If this were all, there would be no problem. The puritans would be routed and the permissivists justified. Unfortunately, there is another side to the matter.

We may recall that a few years ago there was a song "Money is the Root of all Evil" Some people pointed out that not money, but the love for money is the root of all evil well, of a lot of evil, anyway. And here is the snag. Sexual pleasure like money is not "evil" or unskilled , but attachment to sexual pleasure like the love of money is.

If we can experience the pleasure without attachment we are all right; if we become attached to it, we are not "hitting the mark. But attachment is kamma, and unskilled kamma at that. And the results of that will inevitably, according to Buddhism, be something unpleasant in the future. Many people will find this explanation novel. Some will find it puzzling.